It seems to be a means to continue, perhaps accelerate what we know is already so damaging to mother earth. Perhaps it is much worse in the short term? as it attracts human and financial capital away from what is really needed to help the masses. On the flip side, it may incentivise investment in renewable energy, especially if future energy requirements for AI plummet, eg the sector melts down or becomes incredibly more energy efficient? However, reducing is not something we are good at.
It seems to be a means to continue, perhaps accelerate what we know is already so damaging to mother earth. Perhaps it is much worse in the short term? as it attracts human and financial capital away from what is really needed to help the masses. On the flip side, it may incentivise investment in renewable energy, especially if future energy requirements for AI plummet, eg the sector melts down or becomes incredibly more energy efficient? However, reducing is not something we are good at.